|
|
| by Christopher
Spencer |
Former Senior
Advisor International Organizations, Canadian Department of
Foreign Affairs and International Trade |
| Updated: 13 SEP
08 | |
F.H.Abed, "Micro-Credit, Poverty and Development: the Case of Bangladesh" in Behind the
HeadlinesVol.57/ No.2-3 (Winter/Spring 00):-micro-credit -small loans made to poor
households/individuals to finance small-scale entrepreneurial activities- has expanded
rapidly(world target is now $20b), and encouraged hope for major cost-effective global
poverty-reduction. "NGOs in Asia, Africa, and Latin America are largest providers of micro-credit
to those sections of society - rural landless, disadvantagedwomen, marginal farmers, and wage
labourers - who depend largely on selling their labour for a living" (12). These target groups
reflect the fact that it is often the only way very poor can break cycle of povertyresulting from
a lack of collateral and exorbitant local interest charges. It produced high success ratesnot only
in poverty-reduction(and repayment:98%)but in social reform, economic development,
education/training, and growth of assets for both borrowers/lenders, which is reinvested. Abed,
director ofBangladesh Rural Advancement Committee, among world's largest NGO's, offers
much globally-relevant information:big issues/questions; scale/approach/result;
specialties(income-useful education, social development).
Virginia D. Abernethy, Population Politics: The Choices that Shape Our Future(New York: Insight
Books 93):-an influential source, frequently cited for its study of human incentives. It takes now
widely-held view that developing an informed motivation to lower fertility rates(e.g. perception
of limited resources)must often precede active use of contraceptives. It also makes radical
proposal: total US immigration ban.[In fact, current migration from poor to rich countries barely
affects demographic pressures or trends, although short-distance, large-scale movements (such
as from Bangladesh to Assam)can have local impact.] G. Pascal Zachary, "An Unconventional
Academic Sounds Population Alarm" in Wall Street Journal 31 Jul 98, reports that Abernethy
opposed most aid to poor countries since, contrary to "demographic transition" theory(that
fertility falls as living standards rise), prosperity increases fertility.[Most experts probably feel
that while" transition" is much more complex than once thought, perceiving its complete
reversalwould:(1)confuse some immediate, with major long-term, effects of rising living
standards (low OECD fertility);(2)ignore many other factors, e.g. female education; women's
choice; cultural imperatives.]
Diane Ackerman et al., The New Age of Discovery: A Celebration of Mankind's Exploration of the
Unknown (Toronto: Time Canada 97):-although"popular"in format, purpose/content are serious:
17 thoughtful essays contributed by leading scientists and academics. Aim is to survey where
scientific discovery now stands, and where it is taking us. Many topics are or will be global
and/or UN issues: health/ageing; defence against asteroids; DNA/climatic discoveries and
implications; "Third World" -relevant technology; genderdifferences; care of global commons
and indigenous peoples; extraterrestrial life; new energy forms; ethical computing;
"homogenization" of world; special global challenges. Relatively easy place to start looking at
trends and prospects- particularly if your background not in science. Survey is just example
ofvaluable collections of what are in fact 21st-Century global issues, put together by good
general periodicals(dailies, weeklies, monthlies),often to mark occasions like anniversaries or
new years/decades. Those fitting our purposes here would be forward-looking, deal with
subjects global in scope or importance, be written by top impartial authorities, and preferably
offer reading lists.
James Adams, The Next World War: Computers Are the Weapons and the Front Line Is
Everywhere(New York: Simon & Schuster 98):-not primarily about technology, but rather warning
about (un)anticipated effects of accelerating revolution in many-faceted field of information
warfare(IW). Uses many original sources to explain fundamental changes in nature of combat.
Weapons can be disabling, non-lethal, long-distance, unmanned, multi-use, minuscule... Wars
may be battlefield-less, electronic, adversary-ambiguous, instantaneous... Intelligence and
surveillance will be pervasive/often decisive. At same time, vast technical lead -and complexity
- of rich countries' forces/societies also creates immense (cyber)vulnerability. In global
North-South terms, implies economically-advanced states will prefer to fight by exploiting their
technology, while any less-advanced opponents will tend to concentrate their attackson that
technology's weak points.[World community/UN will find "violent conflict" (formal inter-state
war now very rare)not only creates multiple new diplomatic/legal issues(time/space limits,
sanctions, intervention, lethality, causes, costs, crimes)but, most difficult of all, is increasingly
ambiguous, in terms of "participants" (both initiators and intended enemies/victims),
location(e.g. if electronic, disease-inducing, and/or delayed-action), aims(already true of
terrorism), even very existence(e.g. cyber-, resource- or bio-conflict; deliberate/ accidental?).One
major consequence then is that entire concept of conflict-resolution transformed.]
Patricia Adams and Grainne Ryder, "China's Great Leap Backward: Uneconomic and Outdated,
the Three Gorges Dam Will Stunt China's Economic Growth" International Journal
Vol.LIII/No.4(Autumn 98):-fear of global warming produced above all by fossil fuels' carbon
dioxide caused real concern about China's vast impact as world's largest producer/consumer
of coal, worst fossil fuel CO2 source. Yet large hydroelectric dams also produced great
environmental damage, and Three Gorges Dam will be largest in world. Hence article argues
Dam hydro-generation should be replaced by "either combined cycle gas turbines or
cogeneration [which] would reduce CO2 emissions by more than 60%" (694).(Explanation in
article.)Unfortunately, case is made with such CO2 focus that critical purpose of dam
"flood-control" is ignored. See massive global threat from flooding: Economist 11 Mar 00(op.cit.).
Agence France-Presse"U.N. Chief Blames Rich Nations for Failure of Trade Talks"New York
Times 13 Feb 00:-UNSG Kofi Annan told Conference on Trade and Development(UNCTAD) in
Bangkok that breakdown of WTO meeting in Seattle was not result of violent NGO protests, but
was the fault of world's most powerful nations which "could not agree on their priorities" . While
the developing nations playedmore "active and united role" than ever before, industrial powers"
bickered among themselves" and showed "they did not have will to carry out reforms
in[trade]rules" . Annan said barriers were excluding LDCs from benefits of global trade, and
called for a "Global New Deal" to "spread the advantages of freer flow of goods, jobs and
capital among all countries...open to investment" . Seth Mydans"U.N. Trade Meeting Brings Rich
and Poor No Closer"NYT 20 Feb 00:-UNCTAD "ended with no real narrowing of differences" that
split WTO meeting, thus confirming UNSG's pessimism. There were only " general expressions
of hope that rich and poor nations might eventually agree on formula that would allow them to
share benefits of global trade." To this end, LDCs had again demanded fully opened markets
for their products, and objected to standards of environmental and worker protection that simply
delayed their development. Algeria claimed Africa is being crushed - indeed "rubbed out" - by
new world trade order. The Economist 13 May 00"The WTO: Merry-Go-Round" (75-6):-provides
useful update on WTO-related issues since WTO/UNCTAD meetings, andconfirms both Annan's
complaints: US and EU still "bickering" , and LDCs still getting raw deal. For another, more
optimistic/forward-looking update on Transatlantic bickering:Economist 30 Sep 00"Trade:
Boom...".
Shardul Agrawala and Steinar Andresen, "Indispensability and Indefensibility? The United States
in the Climate Treaty Negotiations" Global Governance Vol.5/No.4(Oct/Dec 99):-insightful essay
not only relevant to most critical environmental issue facing global community(Grubb 99 op.cit);
helps explain both sudden changes or galling intransigence in US positions on variety
multilateral questions(for UN: Lyons op.cit.).Recalls major US environment statements, policies
and positions, and shows them surprisingly erratic even under same president. Then identifies
powers and interests of many forces and often key individuals within US administrations,
Congress, industry, public opinion and dedicated pressure groupsthat influenced environmental
policy, and shows how their interplay affected or determined volatile orstubborn US position on
climate change at various times.
AIDS: THIRD WORLD: COST-PATENT DILEMMA; GLOBAL ASSISTANCE
AIDS: THIRD WORLD: INFECTION RATES AND SOCIAL-ECONOMIC ISSUES
AIDS: THIRD WORLD: MEDICAL DEVELOPMENTS AND CHALLENGES
AIDS: THIRD WORLD: POLICY ISSUES AND CONFERENCES
The HIV/AIDS pandemic is viewed increasingly as the most serious challenge facing global
society. Almost all material on this subject is found in the media and is included in RECENT
DEVELOPMENTS. To reach all media selections relating to AIDS, click on AIDS Third World.
John B. Alexander, Future War: Non-Lethal Weapons in Twenty-First Century Warfare(New York:
St. Martin's Press 99):-excellent study of immense potential of non-lethal weapons, and impact
of global trends on aims of security. Assumed US/NATO must(via UN)be world police force.
Emerging threats for armed forces/police are: powerful criminal/terrorist organizations, together
with transnational/religiousbodies/groups seeing themselves as politically, economically or
socially deprived. Wide range of non-lethal weaponry includes acoustic, biological, chemical,
electromagnetic weapons, physical restraints, low-impact projectiles, information warfare.
Useful scenarios: peace support(UN)operations; technologicalsanctions; strategic paralysis;
hostages or barricades. Issues addressed: practical limitations, strategicimplications, moral
opposition, legal considerations, and constraints on "winning" .
Chadwick F. Alger, edit. The Future of the United Nations System: Potential for the Twenty-First
Century(New York: United Nation Univ. Press 98):-implies, in Introduction and writers'
biographies, itconcentrates on peace research. While most of dozen chapters bring that subject
in at end of their main text, this concern does not distort generally excellent historical
summaries of major areas of UN activity, norobjective identification of problems/reform
proposals. Writers expert so usually offer unbiased/accurate snapshots of where UN stands
now; how it got there; where it is probably going. Chapters essentially deal with: disarmament,
"tough" intervention, peacekeeping, work with NGOs; internal conflicts; human
rights;North-South economics; women's rights; refugees; environment; communications; peace
education. Except for last, all are summarized.
Chris Anderson, "The Young(stressing Youth and Age)" The Economist 23 Dec 00(Survey
1-16):-explorescauses/ elements/global impact of major social trend, strong in North America,
spreading through advanced/emerging societies and already changing poorer countries(Japan,
Germany, China)." About...growing influence of young adults in world, and especially working
world...thanks to convergence of forces that play to youth's strength -from technology to...pace
of change to...tearing down of traditional...order.[T]hey are...first young who are both in position
to change world, and are actually doing so.[Y]oung people increasingly make own environment,
thanks to shift in power that gives them opportunity, responsibility and tools once reserved for
their elders" .Rapid, relentless pace ofchange(technological/social)favours young, since they
learn/relearn faster/easier/can afford to risk more to try new things(including jobs).In
organizations, hierarchies of mature giving way to meritocracies in order to compete/ survive,
initiate/adjust to change, and as knowledge/skill/even experience needs constant
updating/replacement. Youth: welcome change; think flexibly/technologically;
exploit(mobile)skills; riskfutures; prefer opportunity to wealth/ security; demand/deserve
respect. "Youth and Government" in issue(61-2)reports youth's growing role/impact in
decision-making.[ "W]ell-prepared input can be more influential than[votes - point often made
about NGOs' power being in knowledge]Young people...are not only leaders of tomorrow;
increasingly they are leaders of today" .
Kofi A. Annan, Renewal Amid Transition: Annual Report on the Work of the Organization, 1997,
by the Secretary-General of the United Nations (New York: UN DPI/1927 or Sales No.: E.97.I.23
- Sep 1997). - distinctly shorter (70pp) than most Annual Reports, Annan's first covers only some
highlights of various UN activities from mid-1996 to mid-1997. It complements his "Programme
for Reform" by reporting on a number of early changes. Tessitore (op. cit.) gives much more
detail on each subject covered by Annan, but the S-G's Report offers a quick overview that
UNA-USA can then amplify selectively. For general information on Annual Reports: UN
Secretary-General (op. cit.).
Kofi A. Annan, "The Quiet Revolution" Global Governance Vol.4/No.2(Apr-Jun 98):-fine updating
of Secretary-General worldview and priorities. Globalization is "most rapid reconfiguration
of...economic geography ever" so UN must exploit"mutual benefits of change while managing
adverse effects...UN's past pattern of incremental adaptations will not suffice." Must do what "it
does better than others" ;collaborate more with international bodies/civil society: NGOs
/business/academe. UN aim"strategic resource deployment, unity ofpurpose, coherence of
effort/agility/flexibility" .
Kofi A. Annan, Partnerships for Global Community: Annual Report on the Work of the
Organization 1998, by the Secretary-General of the United Nations (New York: UN DPI/1997 or
Sales No: E.99.1.3 - Sep 1998). - Annan's second Annual Report generally follows the format of
his first in being short (82pp) and covering only some highlights of UN activities. It is however
structured in a more standard manner, fairly closely following the subject matter of UNGA Main
Committees: Achieving peace/security; Cooperating for development; Meeting humanitarian
commitments; Engaging with globalization; Strengthening the international legal order;
Managing change. The tone is more upbeat, with considerable emphasis on what reforms have
been (not, have to be) undertaken. With the S-G an experienced manager himself, space
allocated to improved administration is expanded (the Office of Legal Affairs gets almost three
pages). At the other extreme, the critical work of the Population Fund is given 16 lines, with no
mention of family planning! With the irreplaceable world body's collapse still credibly threatened
by a few unrepresentative politicians in a single member state, perhaps some catering to their
prejudice was necessary.
Kofi A. Annan, "Preventing War and Disaster: A Growing Global Challenge" , Annual Report on
the Work of the Organization 1999, by the Secretary-General of the United Nations(New York:
DPI/2058; Sales No: E.99.1.29-Sep 1999):-after a convincing plea for more cost-saving global
efforts to foresee, prevent, or reduce human and natural crises, Annan summarizes all major UN
activities over year to Sep 99, and selected plans and problems(in 130pp). Chapters address:
peace and security; development; humanitarian issues; globalization; legal order; human rights;
administration. Overall impression: hard-won progress implementing UN
obligations/reforms/savings are frustrated by Members' selfishness/lack of political will/financial
irresponsibility. Summaries are made of the 1999 Report's comments on all major topics(op.cit.).
Kofi A. Annan, "UN Committed to Ensuring World Water Security and 'Blue Revolution', Says
Secretary-General, in Message to World Water Forum" in UN Press Release SG/SM/7334 21 Mar
00:-urgent global problem is finding huge additional quantities of affordable water to meet
increasing needs of population growth/concentration and rising agricultural/industrial demand,
and to make up for global pollution andfalling water tables(see Worldwatch Institute: Lester R.
Brown, "Water: Emerging Constraint on Growth" (123-5)in State of the World(1999)op.cit.). Hence
"world's impending water crisis" was theme of UNSG's text. He reported that "every year, more
than 5 million people[over 50% children]die as a result of poor water quality - 10 times the
number killed in wars...[W]ithin 25 years two out of every three people on Earth will live in
water-stressed conditions. Indeed, the declining state of the world's freshwater resources, in
terms of quantity and quality, may well prove to be the dominant issue on the environment and
development agenda of the new century" . UN Newservice 21 Mar 00: Klaus Toepfer, UNEP head,
at the Forum: "The battle for the conservation of water will be won or lost in the mega-cities of
the world" .[Technology can help:]Douglas Jehl, "Tampa Bay Looks to the Sea to Quench Its
Thirst" in New York Times12 Mar 00:-US appears to be just reaching the stage when many
high-density areas need, or find it economic, to desalinate sea or brackish water. Tampa
Bay(2.3m residents)will be the first large urban areato do so, planning the largest(25m
gallons/day)desalinization plant outside Saudi Arabia(whose economics are totally different). As
of writing, five states(cheaply)desalinate brackish water, while two cities which built sea-water
plants decades ago, now use them for backup due to cost. But Tampa cost estimates have fallen
from $4-6 per 1,000 gallons to $2.08. With several cities planning desalinization, and many more
facing the need, economics/technology may now produce a global cost breakthrough. [World
FDI and ODA may soon include large expenditures on desalination.]
Kofi A. Annan, "We the Peoples: The Role of the United Nations in the 21st Century" Millennium
Report of S-G presented 03 Apr 00 to UNGA in preparation for the Millennial Summit 6-8 Sep 00:-
Executive Summary, Key Proposals, Full Report, Fact Sheet, Press Releases, SG UNGA
Statement, SG Press Conference Transcript: all under http://www.un.org/millennium/sg/report/.
Annan said report "attempts to present a comprehensive account of the challenges facing
humanity as we enter the twenty-first century, combined with a plan of action for dealing with
them" . Section titles with(very tight)summaries: I. New Century, New Challenges: New
millennium-Summit offers unique occasion to reflect on world's common destiny, since
interconnected as never before. UN can help meet challenges ahead and be reshaped now to
make a real difference. II. Globalization and Governance: Globalization unequally distributed and
lacks shared social objectives. More people(plus crime, drugs, terrorism, pollution, disease,
weapons, migrants, refugees)interact across frontiers faster, and feel more threatened/ horrified
by distant events/conditions. New technologies enable common understanding/action, so must
learn to govern better, together. States need mutual help via common institutions, from
non-state actors, and informal policy networks. The unequal/unstable/unsustainable world
development model needs agreed remedial measures. III. Freedom From Want: .5b live on less
than $1 a day, so must reduce extreme poverty by half before 2015. Priorities: sustained growth;
all children complete primary school by 2015 and all youth finddecent work; by 2010 HIV
infection rate in young cut by 25% -one result of more LDC-relevant research; improve lives of
100m slum dwellers by 2020; experts/charities to tackle low agricultural productivity in Africa,
as governments give higher priority to poverty; maximize LDC access to infonets to speed
development; rich states open markets to LDCs, offer more debt relief, and focus increased
ODA. IV.Freedom From Fear: internal wars killed 5m in decade; WMD remain threat; security
protects people, not territory. Tackle conflict by: prevention, more balanced development,
human/minority rights, exposingweapons/money/resource smuggling; protect the vulnerable by
enforcing international/human rights law; using UNSC for armed intervention when rights and
lives are massively violated; consider peace operations review panel proposals; target "smart"
sanctions more; improve control of small arms transfers, and reduce dangers of existing nuclear
arms and proliferation. V. Sustaining Our Future: Most planet-sustaining actions are too few,
little, and late. Before 2002, must: cope with climate change: reduce emissions 60% by
efficient/renewable energy, implementing Kyoto Protocol; meet water crisis: accept 2015 target
of 50% reduction in those without safe/affordable water, raise agricultural productivity per unit
of water, improve management; defend soil: biotechnology may be best hope for sufficient food
production, so debate must be resolved globally; preserve forests, fisheries, biodiversity with
joint government/private sector conservation; build new stewardship ethic: public education,
integration ofenvironment into economic policy, regulations/ incentives, accurate scientific data.
VI. Renewing the UN: Must find consensus solutions among governments, private sector, NGOs,
and IOs, with UN as catalyst. Build on core UN strengths(norm-setting, global actions,
humanitarian trust)to press rule of law, adapt UNSC, and work with NGOs, private sector and
foundations, including through informal policy networks; work with industry to exploit
information technology; improve UN management throughstructural/agenda reform,
priority-setting, more flexibility, results-based budgeting. VII. For Consideration by the Summit:
Act on basis of shared Charter values: Freedom, Equity and Solidarity, Tolerance, Non-Violence,
Respect for Nature, Shared Responsibility. Adopt resolutions drawn from Report as
evidence.Reviews: Barbara Crossette, "Annan Urges High-Tech Aid for Poor Countries" in New
York Times 4 Apr;The Economist 8 Apr: "Kofi Annan's Words to the World: Bouncing to a Fairer
World" (51).
Kofi A. Annan, "Common Destiny, New Resolve" , Annual Report on the Work of the Organization
2000, by the Secretary-General of the United Nations(New York: DPI/2153;Sales No.E.00.1.22-Sep
99):-UNSG begins by noting report to Millennium Summit, "We the Peoples: The Role of the
United Nations in the 21st Century" (op.cit.), includes his assessment of humanity's progress
and challenges at turn of millennium,and suggests ways in which international community can
work together to" better lives of people still left behind" .Introduction, summarizing 130-page
report on major UN activities over year to Sep 00, highlights: (1)Demands on UN humanitarian
agencies far exceeded worst-case predictions; (2)Living standards in sub-Saharan Africa still
declining; (3)AIDS pandemic spreads with frightening rapidity; needs stronger commitment to
action; (4)Three new peace missions were created, straining UNHQ resources.
(5)Reviewsanalysed UN failures in Srebrenica and Rwanda; offered recommendations. (6)
controversial economicbenefits of globalization must be more inclusive/equitably shared.
(7)Must be cooperative management ofglobal economic affairs through more effective
governance. (8)Informal global policy networks involving governments, international institutions,
civil society and private sector have great potential. Chapters: Peace/Security; Humanitarian
Commitments; Development; International Legal Order/Human Rights; UNManagement.
Kofi A. Annan, Report of the [UN] Secretary-General to the Preparatory Committee for the
High-level International Intergovernmental Event on Financing for Development:-this
collaborative effort(officially UNGA Document A/AC.257/12)runs to 64 pages, makes 87
recommendations, and was commissioned bythe Millennium Summit to help focus discussion
at a Mar 2002 global meeting on development financing(still an" event" since it awaits an official
title). Involved directly in the report's preparation were: many parts of the UN proper(particularly
DESA, UNCTAD and UNDP); UN Agencies; the Bank, Fund and WTO; theregional development
banks; OECD; the Financial Stability Forum; many governments/otherstakeholders(arranged by
the UN regional commissions); the business community; and civil society organizations. Hence
it reflects extremely varied, expert and authoritative views - significant, since some proposals
are quite radical, even if presented solely on the responsibility of the UN Secretariat. The report
consists of an Introduction and six chapters, the latter perhaps being the agenda items of the
"event" : I. Mobilizing domestic financial resources for development; II. Mobilizing international
resources for development: foreign direct investment and other private flows; III. Trade; IV.
Increasing international financial cooperation for development through, inter alia, official
development assistance; V. Debt; VI. Addressing systemic issues: enhancing coherence and
consistency of the international monetary, financial and trading systems in support of
development. For highlights, see UN Press Release DEV/2275at: http://www.un.org/News/Press
/docs/2001/ dev2275.htm. The complete text(which explains all acronyms!)can also be
downloaded from the Web: http://www.un.org/esa/ffd/aac257-12E.htm
orhttp://www.un.org/esa/ffd/aac257-12E.pdf. For three articles about the Report(highlighting the
dirty bits)see: Christopher S. Wren, "U.N. Report Proposes Steps to Fight Global Poverty" in New
York Times 30 Jan 01;Reuters, "Annan Offers Poor Nations 87 Ways to Lure Funds" NYT 30 Jan;
Wren, "The U.N. Offers 87 Remedies to Help Poor Nations Develop" NYT 04 Feb. The UNSG's
opening speech at the subsequentPrepcom meeting is reported in: Reuters "Annan: Poor
Nations Must Set Development Priorities" NYT 12 Feb. It describes his theme as: LDCs "should
play a greater role in setting policy and priorities in thefinancing of global development" and
cease to be "decided in clubs where only rich countries have real influence" . This issue is of
course a perennial one at the UN, where the contribution-weighted voting in Bretton Woods
bodies is seen as "grossly unfair" and "neo-colonialist" by aid recipients, whose very survival
may be at stake, but "absolutely essential" by the investment-oriented donors, who feel"
shareholders" have natural rights to determine where and how their own money is spent. Annan
aims to increase the relative role of" one-country-one-vote" UN fora(UNGA; ECOSOC)in making
broad global development policies and priorities. He also is very concerned to make foreign
investment in LDCs larger and less volatile as ODA continues its decline. Advising him is a
high-level panel(Zedillo, Rubin, Delors...).
"Anonymous"Imperial Hubris: Why the West Is Losing the War on Terror(DullesVA: Brassey's
04):-author is a senior US intelligence official with nearly 20 years experience in national security
issues related to Afghanistan and South Asia. This strong critique of arrogant US/allies' policies
towards Osama bin Laden/al Qaeda, and military action against Afghanistan/Iraq, proved quickly
influential in many respects, and advocates less US loyalty to Israel/corrupt Muslim regimes or
presence in Mideast. Motivation of Muslim terrorists is identified not as hatred/fear of Western
national systems but of their broadly negative actions against Islamic peoples. All complex
chapter titles: (1)Some Thoughts on the Power of Focused, Principled Hatred. (2) An Unprepared
and Ignorant Lunge to Defeat - The US in Afghanistan. (3) Not Down, Not Out: Al Qaeda's
Resiliency, Expansion, and Momentum. (4) The World's View of bin Laden: A Muslim Leader and
Hero Coming into Focus? (5) Bin Laden Views the World: Some Old, Some New, and a Twist. (6)
Blinding Hubris Abounding: Inflicting Defeat on Ourselves - Non-War, Leaks, and Missionary
Democracy. (7) When the Enemy Sets the Stage: How US's Stubborn Obtuseness Aids Its Foes.
(8) The Way Ahead: A Few Suggestions for Debate. Epilogue: No Basis for Optimism.
Associated Press, "Earth is Menaced by Fewer Killer Asteroids Than Previously Thought" in New
York Times 12 Jan 00:- article deals with a real and major danger from space, not only to entire
cities but to all life on earth, that is far from infinitesimal. Scientists have been estimating that
1-2,000 mountain-sized asteroids periodically cross the earth's orbit. This number produces
about a 1% chance of one hitting the earth per millennium. Since asteroids are lumps of rock,
iron and other material believed left over from the formation of the solar system, and those being
counted have diameters between two-thirds of a mile to six miles, they are big enough to "wreak
global disaster" . NASA has just lowered the estimated numberof such killers to about 700, or
by half. New technology may find 90% within the next 20 years, but there are also lots of smaller
asteroids able to destroy cities. Britain has just set up a risk assessment committee. AP,
"Experts Mull Asteroid Risk" in NYT 18 Sep 00:-the committee mentioned above is reported to
have urged the British government to seek international partners to fund a powerful new
telescopeto be stationed in the southern hemisphere and governments should launch joint
studies to assess how to destroy an object on a collision course with the planet. The committee
estimated that a "wide object" crashes into our planet every 10,000 years with the force of a
100-megaton nuclear bomb. Government reacted:" it's sensible to put just a little[money]into
making certain we know if there is a danger of an object hitting our very fragile planet" .
Associated Press "Nations Vow to Fight Urban Blight" New York Times 09 Jun 01:-results of
five-year-review of progress in meeting UN Habitat Agenda, agreed upon at 96 global summit on
urban issues in Istanbul. New York review conference produced UN Declaration on Cities and
Other Human Settlements in the New Millennium which reaffirmed commitment to Agenda
principles regarding "adequate housing for all and sustainable development of world's cities"
-no easy task since many countries" openly admit they have made little progress since Istanbul
meeting. More than 1b...still lack adequate housing[out of 3b(50%)global urban population, and
since f]ast-growing slums are common on outskirts of Asian, Africa and Latin American cities"
.Textual crises overcome involved Palestinian proposal to criticize Israel, and US refusal to
reaffirm adequate housing as "human right" .
Associated Press"Maritime Authorities OK Tracking Measure"New York Times 19 May
06:-"Maritime authorities have agreed upon new legislation that will allow for long-range tracking
of merchant ships - a key measure in tackling the threat of seaborne terrorist attacks, the UN
International Maritime Organization said [19 May]. A total of 166 countries have agreed to the
new rules for merchant vessels, which would also allow countries to conduct surveillance on
vessels suspected of carrying illicit cargo.Organization said signatory governments had
provisionally agreed to the changes in the Safety of Life at Sea convention... 'Ships will be
required to transmit their identity, location and date and time of theirposition to be tracked by
satellite', said UN shipping agency's external relations officer... New legislation will mean a
ship's position can be identified up to 1,000 nautical miles from shore. Current systems
arelimited to a range of a few hundred nautical miles... Merchant vessels trading in international
waters willneed to switch to new long-range system by Jan 08, offering maritime authorities a
system similar tothat used by air traffic controllers";
Associated Press "Annan Paints Grim Picture to Assembly"New York Times 19 Sep
06:-"Addressing world leaders for last time as UNSG, Kofi Annan painted a grim picture of an
unjust world economy, global disorder, widespread contempt for human rights, and appealed
for nations/peoples to truly unite. As theannual UN General Assembly [UNGA] ministerial
meeting got under way, 192 UN member states facedambitious agenda including trying to
promote Mideast peace, curb Iran's nuclear ambitions, get UN peacekeepers into
conflict-wracked Darfur, promote democracy... Annan, whose second five-year term ends 31 Dec
06, said the past decade has seen progress in development, security, rule of law - the threegreat
challenges he said humanity faced in first address to UNGA in 97. But UNSG said too many still
exposed to brutal conflict, and fear of terrorism has increased clash of civilizations/religions.
Terrorismbeing used as pretext to limit or abolish human rights, and globalization risks driving
richer and poorer apart, he said. 'Events of last 10 years have not resolved, but sharpened, three
great challenges - unjust world economy, world disorder, and widespread contempt for human
rights and rule of law', Annan said.'As result, we face world whose divisions threaten very notion
of an international community, upon which this institution stands. I remain convinced that only
answer to this divided world must be a truly United Nations' , he said. In annual report, UNSG
touched on some of most difficult issues confronting leaders... [Arab-Israeli conflict; Iraq;
Afghanistan; Sudan/Darfur]. 'Together we have pushed some big rocks to top of the mountain,
even if others have slipped from our grasp and rolled back. But this mountain... is best place on
earth to be',UNSG said.'I yield my place to others with an obstinate feeling of hope for our
common future', Annan said. [UNGA] loud applause/rose in sustained standing ovation".
Séverine Autesserre"The Trouble With Congo: How Local Disputes Fuel Regional Conflict"(94-110)Foreign Affairs Vol.87/No.3(May/Jun 08):-official summary:"Although the war in Congo
officially ended in 2003, 2m people have died since. One of the reasons is that the international
community's peacekeeping efforts there have not focused on the local grievances in eastern
Congo, especially those over land, that are fueling much of the broader tensions. Until they do,
the nation's security and that of wider Great Lakes region will remain uncertain". Emphasized
extracts:"Congo is now the stage for the largest humanitarian disaster in the world - far larger
than the crisis in Sudan. [I]nternational actors must tackle situation in Congo from the ground
up". Autesserre is Assistant Professor of Political Science at Barnard College, Columbia Univ.
Robert Baer"THE FP MEMO:- Wanted: Spies Unlike Us"Foreign Policy No.147(Mar/Apr
05):-former CIA case officer 1976-97, and author -See No Evil: The True Story of a Ground Soldier
in the CIA's War on Terrorism(New York: Crown Publishers 02), drafts MEMORANDUM from
himself to Porter Goss, U.S. Director of Central Intelligence, entitled"Getting the CIA Back in the
Game". He writes"CIA is clearly broken, and you have a chance to fix it... Reform is needed
across the board, but the Directorate of Operations(DO) should beyour first target. Its mission
- recruiting and running foreign spies - should be the agency's core function.Give DO the tools
it needs, and intelligence analysis will take care of itself...Here are my suggestions(forming
remainder of the MEMO under following headings): Reform the Promotion System; Know Your
Sources;Recruit on College Campuses; Lower the Retirement Age; Stop Relying on Foreign
Governments;Change the Security Clearance System; Recruit on the Dark Side. [I would myself
disagree with the proposed total lack of cooperation with the world's 200 or so "Foreign
Governments". Even the US could not gain unilaterally all the global information it is going to
need. The global danger of all types/sources of terrorism in the world can only be constrained
if all governments ideally/ostensibly work together.Genuine intelligence activity abroad
could/would lie on top of that.]
Ronald Bailey, "A Clean and Comfortable Planet Without Global Regulation" (171-9)and Gareth
Porter, "Why We Need the United Nations to Protect the Global Environment" (181-9)in Ted Galen
Carpenter, edit.,Delusions of Grandeur: The United Nations and Global Intervention(Washington:
Cato Institute, 1997):- for book annotation, see Carpenter(op.cit.) Contrasting articles disagree
less over reality of environmentalproblems than over whether UN/ states should do anything
about them. Bailey argues UN programs wouldcost money and thus slow wealth-creation - the
automatic solution. Similarly, if left alone, world farmerscould produce as much as US
corn-growers do today -and feed 10 billion people at present US calorie levels on half the present
cropland(174). Global warming is unlikely (UN estimates biased)but if world economy left alone
to get rich, costs can be borne. Porter summarizes consensus views on climate change,
ozonedepletion, ocean pollution, fish depletion, deforestation, biodiversity loss, and argues they
can be addressedonly by global cooperation. He outlines diverse views that impede UN policy/
action, but concludes that the UN is indispensable for progress.
Carter F.Bales & Richard D.Duke "Containing Climate Change: An Opportunity for U.S.
Leadership"(78-89) Foreign Affairs Vol.87/No.5(Sep/Oct 08):-official summary:"Greenhouse gas
emissions are harming the environment and the global economy. After cleaning up its own act,
US must enlist developing countries in a new climate-control regime that promises to
dramatically reduce emissions and encourage energy efficiency and the development of clean-energy technology". Emphasized extracts:"A cap-and-invest strategy would allow US to develop
a clean economy at little or no net cost". "Time has come for US to lead the fight against global
warming at home and abroad". Bales: Managing Partner Emeritus of Wicks Group of Companies.
Duke: Director of Natural Resources Defense Council's Center for Market Innovation.
Scott Barrett Why Cooperate? The Incentive to Supply Global Public Goods (New York: Oxford
Univ Press 07):-surprisingly well written -considering the complexity of issues- in: (1) describing
the existing global challenges (e.g. climate change, nuclear proliferation, worldwide pandemics)
and those that threaten the entire planet (e.g. terrorism, physical/chemical/biological instabilities,
asteroids); and (2) reporting on how such problems have been successfully or badly handled
in the past, the rationales involved, and the various cooperations that would/might work best in
future. Barrett's "threat" approach differs from my item "EARTH MUST COOPERATE...", mainly
in stressing "Global Public Goods" actions of the recent past (e.g.often successful United
Nations; wonderful "Montreal Protocol" ozone treaty), whereas my gloomy and concentrated
"page" is designed almost solely to identify: (1) the exploding scale/variety of global threats; (2)
the human tendencies that have created/will create them; and (3) why we must change a number
of very old human views/feelings. Both press broader global diplomacy as essential tool. Most
chapters focus on distinct types of issue/solution. [Even a study of brief bit(s) of 275p would be
valuable.] Titles: Incentives to Supply Global Public Goods [GPG]; (1) Single Best Efforts: GPG
that Can Be Supplied Unilaterally or Minilaterally; (2) Weakest Links: GPG that Depend on States
that Contribute the Least; (3) Aggregate Efforts: GPG that Depend on Combined Efforts of All
States; (4) Financing and Burden Sharing: Paying for GPG; (5) Mutual Restraint: Agreeing What
States Ought Not to Do; (6) Coordination and Global Standards: Agreeing What States Ought to
Do; (7) Development: Do GPG Help Poor States?; Conclusion: Institutions for Supply of GPG.
Felicity Barringer "Nations Ranked as Protectors of the Environment"New York Times 24 Jan
05:-2005 has produced"index of environmental sustainability, which ranks nations on their
success at such tasks asmaintaining/improving air and water quality, maximizing biodiversity
and cooperating with other countries on environmental problems...Report is based on 75
measures, including rate at which children die from respiratory diseases, fertility rates[of what?],
water quality, overfishing, emission of heat-trapping gases, and export of sodium dioxide,
crucial component of acid rain. Report also cited statisticallysignificant correlation between
high-ranking countries and[those]with open political systems/effective governments."Top ten
out of 146 countries studied were(in their order):Finland, Norway, Uruguay, Sweden, Iceland,
Canada, Switzerland, Guyana, Argentina, Austria. US ranked 45th, behind such countries as
Japan, Botswana, Bhutan, most of Western Europe. Lowest-ranking country was North Korea;
others near bottom were Haiti, Taiwan, Iraq, Kuwait. Index is second produced in collaboration
with World Economic Forum(Davos, Switzerland).
Jean-Francois Bayart, Stephen Ellis & Beatrice Hibou The Criminalization of the State in Africa
(Oxford: James Currey 99):-inevitably researched unscientifically, seeks to explain multiple
political-economic crises of Africa(i.e.south of Sahara)as whole. "African specialists" after
lamenting demography/stagnation-acerbated poverty/hyper-urbanization, highlight certain
developments: facade of democratic transition/ structural adjustment/other reforms; armed
conflicts' continuation or spread; above all, elites' massive involvement in corrupt/criminal
activities(drugs/other smuggling; political-financial/other fraud; coercion/ violence). While driven
by change, these African reactions show historical influence of approvingaccumulation of power
and wealth through devious personal initiative. Thus nationalism, government and law are
simply used; their criminalization culturally-rooted.
Barbara Beck, "A Survey of Women and Work: For Better, For Worse" in The Economist 18 Jul
98(1-16):-an excellent economic and social examination of the formal employment of women,
including a human-rights-related analysis of why so few are found in the top levels of business.
Most information is on OECDcountries - which have the best statistics and seem to lead a global
trend. Subjects include: history, e.g. the combined impact of safe contraception and the
transformation of labor needs; OECD employment trendsand their reasons; gender variation by
job type, pay and unemployment; maternity and paternity leave,daycare, shared child care and
housework, career-breaks, taxation and birthrate issues. All are UN issuesnow; its actively trying
to improve its own employee gender balance.
Zanny Minton Beddoes"Global Finance: Time for a Redesign?"The Economist 30 Jan 99 (1-18):-
excellent SURVEY: (1)identifies perceived and objective problems with generally uncontrolled,
if IMF- "cushioned" ,world financial system;(2)describes often radical, mutually incompatible,
and/or unfeasible reform plans;(3)offers some more modest but workable proposals. Dangers
include certainty of crises if systems are not changed; IMF's "moral-hazard" role not reduced.
Reform ideas range from IMF-abolition, through capital controls, to creation of global regulator,
central bank, or world currency. Incompatibleobjectives remain: maintaining national
sovereignty/ regulating financial markets/benefiting from global capital markets.
Proposals:(1)rich states can improve norms of own financial markets;(2)can encourage
responsible creditor behaviour;(3)institutions must innovate.
Zanny Minton Beddoes, "From EMU to AMU? The Case for Regional Currencies" (8-13)in Foreign
AffairsVol.78/No.4 (Jul/Aug 99):-Washington economics writer for The Economist predicts that
by 2030 the world will have two major currency zones, result of regional currency unions. Whole
of Europe will use euro, whilewhole Western Hemisphere and possibly parts of Asia will use the
dollar. Reason is that: "Regional currencies will prove the best route to reconciling the economic
imperatives of increasing international capital mobility with the political realities of the
nation-state" (8). More specifically, many emerging economies will have to curb capital flows,
so the author argues by examining other options(floating exchange rates, fixed rates, currency
boards)that most efficient way is currency union since it makes most credible commitment to
stability, acting as "bulwark against protectionism" (13).
Zanny Minton Beddoes, "The International Financial System: Think Again" (16-27)Foreign Policy
No.116(Fall 1999):-the Economist's Washington economics correspondent argues against,
qualifies, or supports numerous widely-held views about a need for new global financial
architecture: a global market for capital does not yet exist; most just moves about. Allowing free
capital movement in and out of a countrymay stimulate economic growth, if action is not
premature. Recent emerging-market crashes are worse, but not more frequent, than before. Their
"contagion" is not always irrational. Most crises are caused by weak banking systems, helped
by lack of "due diligence" by foreign banks. Most ideas for new "global financial architecture"
are ill-advised and/or politically unfeasible. Reforms should not concentrate on capital flows
control; at most dissuade short-term flows. A global central bank is unrealistic and imperfect.
IMF merits some criticism and "moral hazard" concerns, but bailouts are not to blame for
international economiccrises, and few private investors escape lightly. Major lessons have been
learned.
Jagdish Bhagwati,"The Capital Myth: The Difference between Trade in Widgets and Dollars"
Foreign AffairsVol.77/No.3(May/Jun 98):-one"prevalent myth is that despite the striking evidence
of the inherently crisis-prone nature of freer capital movements, a world of full capital mobility
continues to be inevitable and immensely desirable". The author disagrees, arguing that while
there is correspondence between free trade in goods and services and free capital mobility,
capital flows suffer from "panics and manias". Financial crisesare very costly and cannot be
eliminated by global banking system reform. Hence capital mobility needs some restraint. The
Economist 23 May 98:"Capital Controversies"(112)supports Bhagwati: capital liberalization must
proceed cautiously. For an ostensible counter-view to Bhagwati, see Shailendra J. Anjaria "The
Capital Truth: What Works for Commodities Should Work for Cash" Foreign Affairs Vol.77/No.6
(Nov/Dec 98):-in fact this IMF official's view is also very cautious: there must be a process of
gradual adaptation. Without both sound macroeconomic policies and strong, transparent and
properly supervised banks, opening up capital flows is dangerous and inadvisable(143). A
consensus developing on constrained capital flows?
A.S.Bhalla edit. Globalization, Growth and Marginalization(Ottawa: IDRC 98):-a very valuable
study (for those knowing basic economics)of the effects of globalization on LDCs. The term is
defined here using several global features: trade growth; FDI and capital flows growth; some
globally-run production consumption; trade and investment liberalization; global-scale
competition; the loss to national sovereignty; the standardization of values and cultures. The
aim is to analyse globalization's impact on: (1) growth and productivity; (2) poverty and
inequality; (3) employment. The LDCs are studied by region for both policies and effects. The
conclusion is that while every LDC must bend to globalization, its social costs are so great that
they must be anticipated. The book includes a good menu of possible research.
Samuel R.Berger"Foreign Policy for a Democratic President"Foreign Affairs Vol.83/No.3(May/Jun
04):-aimed at those concerned about weaknesses in US foreign policy of Bush regime, and
needs/opportunities in modified policies of any Nov 04-elected Democratic(or amended)regime.
Most issues discussed of global relevance, and many stress US relations with foreign entities,
particularlyNATO/UN/international law. This mentions those of global importance discussed in
some detail. US administration's "high-handed style and its gratuitous unilateralism" about its
military, economic and cultural aims, embittered even those abroad most likely to embrace US
values. New US regime "no moreurgent task than to restore...global moral and political authority,
so when we decide to act we canpersuade others to join us. Achieving reversal will require
forging new strategic bargain with closest allies...Democratic approach to resolving disputes
with Europe over treaties should be pragmatic, focused on improving flawed agreements rather
than ripping them up". US policy towards Israel-Palestine conflictmust return with energy/
urgency. Regarding Afghanistan/Pakistan and Iraq," Bush administration'sunilateralist approach
has let allies off hook: given them excuse to shirk these and other global responsibilities.
Democratic administration would not be so dismissive of allies on issues that matter to them"
since exercises truly international rather than exclusively US. Similar approaches are relevant
to spread of weapons of mass destruction(WMD)." Democratic administration should use every
tool at disposal to prevent WMD threats from arising before force becomes only option" . Listed
issues include Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction Program with Russia, and "global
effort to secure nuclear materials at all such sites" .Others sites described are North Korea and
Iran. Non-Proliferation Treaty(NPT)might add "new bargain" helping non-nuclear countries
develop nuclear energy. Many more issues are brief.
Bruce D.Berkowitz"War Logs On: Girding America for Computer Combat"Foreign Affairs
Vol.79/No.3(May/Jun 00) :-reports that attacking an opponent's computer networks(and
defending your own)have become matters of interest and concern as natural elements of
warfare. Several developments make opportunities/dangers both obvious and irresistible.
(1)Computers are now involved in every aspectof world's armed forces - a dependence making
them vulnerable, and creating multiple targets. (2)Civiliansociety depends more on computers,
too, using networks even more vulnerable than military systems. (3)Modern telecommunications
are linking world's computer systems, so any data-processing devicelinked to communications
networks is vulnerable. (4)Weapons/ technology usable for computer warfarekeep improving;
lasers/microwaves for electronic attack may be replaced by(false?)electronic data.
(5)Strategy/tactics are also being improved, to deceive, confound and confuse opponents.
Computer warfare must be fully integrated into planning, perhaps years ahead, and involves very
complex policyissues concerning targeting, secrecy, oversight, and defense.
Jagdish Bhagwati "Free Trade Today"(Princeton: Princeton Univ Press 02):-while only 140pp
long (including Preface and Index), and presented in the form of three Lectures (with multiple
footnotes - mainly identifying sources), this famous book is often described as the greatest
defense for global free trade ever written. Dustcover claims:"Forcefully, elegantly, and clearly
written for the public by one of the foremost economic thinkers of our day [Professor at
Columbia Univ. and a special adviser to UN and particularly GATT/WTO], this volume is not
merely accessible but essential reading for anyone interested in economic policy orin the world
economy". Titles: LECTURE 1: "Confronting Conventional Threats to Free Trade: The Postwar
Revolution in the Theory of Commercial Policy"; LECTURE 2: "'Fair Trade', Income Distribution,
and Social Agendas: Using Trade Theory to Meet New Challenges"; LECTURE 3: "Getting to Free
Trade: Alternative Approaches and Their Theoretical Rationale". While 1 is difficult for those
without economic training, 2 and 3 can be easily handled by any who regularly read international
affairs. Editor's own summary: "Bhagwati applies critical insights from revolutionary
developments in commercial policy theory... to show how the pursuit of social and
environmental agendas can be creatively reconciled withthe pursuit of free trade. Indeed, he
argues that free trade, by raising living standards, can serve these agendas far better than can
a descent into trade sanctions and restrictions. [H]e argues in support of multilateralism and
advances a withering critique of recent bilateral and regional free trade agreements". Bhagwati's
also famous"In Defense of Globalization"(Oxford Univ 04), offers a 300+pp broader approach.
Nancy Birdsall "Life Is Unfair: Inequality in the World" Foreign Policy No.111(Summer 98):-ratio
of average income of world's richest country to poorest grown from about 9 to 1 around century
ago to at least 60 to 1 today; 80% of world's population in states generating only 20% of world
income. National-income divide between well-educated elite and vulnerable/unskilled usually
both evident/widening. Many causes: history; demography; access; policies(trade/
labour/services/investment).Now technology/computers play key role: information and skills are
key assets. Hence essential to provide maximum of education/opportunity; states must use
labour, and trade/equal access better. "The real danger...growing inequality may become
lightning rod for populist rhetoric and self-defeating isolation" .
Nancy Birdsall and Arvind Subramanian, "Saving Iraq From Its Oil" Foreign Affairs
Vol.83/No.4(Jul/Aug 04):-reports on essential poor-country assets that delay democracy. "Oil
riches are far from blessing they are often assumed to be. In fact, countries often end up poor
precisely because they are oil rich. Oil and mineral wealth can be bad for growth and bad for
democracy, since they tend to impede developmentof institutions and values critical to open,
market-based economies and political freedom: civil liberties, rule of law, protection of property
rights, and political participation" .In both this and Fareed Zakaria The Future of
Freedom(73-6)(op.cit.)oil/minerals criticized for "richness" .[In my view, serious fault relates not
inherently to basic/processed elements(still essential to global economy; no harm to many
states; maybe sole globalization starter locally available), but to any extremely narrow
concentration of any local affluence, whatever produced it(slaves? elephant tusks?
diamonds?)].Essay is (otherwise)useful in reporting how often developing countries badly run
when they have local oil production, and hence all Iraqi oil profits should ideally be passed
directly to all Iraqi citizens individually.
Matthew Bishop, "Globalisation and Tax: The Mystery of the Vanishing Taxpayer" in The
Economist 29 Jan 00(1-22) :-this SURVEY claims that "globalization, accelerated by the Internet,
is exposing serious flaws in the world's tax systems[even though]the taxman's cut of world
income is larger today than it has ever been" . Indeed, OECD believes expedited globalization
"might damage tax systems so badly that it could'lead to governments being unable to meet the
legitimate demands of citizens for public services' " (5). Two reasons:(1) Easy legal mobility of
business, money, individuals(including "into" tax havens), plus Internet's anonymous electronic
money and encryption, make it much easier to evade/hide from any jurisdiction's taxes, while
"virtual" goods and services moved via Internet are also very hard to tax; (2)Global rivalry for
investment, and instant Internet information, may intensify inter-government tax competition.
Possiblereaction: global tax-harmonization agreements; more consumption/environment taxes.
Tony Blair "A Year of Huge Challenges" The Economist 01 Jan 05(By Invitation 44-6):-British PM
presents two major global initiatives, to urge G8 to organize and substantially pay(Britain: 05
president).Essay makes strong cases in favor since, "with threat from international terrorism and
spread of weapons of mass destruction.,. they are most serious problems facing world today
[and] problems beyond power of any single country...Solution requires co-ordinated
international action, and above all leadershipwhich G8 is uniquely placed to give. The two
initiatives relate to solving African issues and attacking climate change. Here the only material
summarized is on Sorting Out Africa. "[P]lagued with problems - debt, disease, conflict,
corruption, weak governance - so embedded/widespread that no continent, no matter how
prosperous, could tackle on its own.[Details of problems provided.]Should this matter to rest of
world?For democratic governments, it should, because it matters to our citizens.[I]t can't be
morally right, in world growing more prosperous/healthier,..that one in six African children still
die before fifth birthday. Worldwide campaign to make poverty history rightly challenges us to
act...We must now all accept utter futility of trying to shut our borders to problems
abroad.[Famine/conflict]create conditions for terrorism/fanaticismto take root and spread[to
globe.]Prosperous Africa, where people have chance to fulfil their talents, is in all our interests
[while] sheer scale of Africa's problems can induce understandable sense ofhopelessness.
Governance been improving faster...than in many other areas[,and]Africa Union playing
increasing role in settling conflicts.[B]est way to reduce poverty is through economic growth.
[This]can be increased by aid[that involves greater donation/effectiveness.] But to help Africa
continue progresswe need...coordinated global effort[,including]concerted action to improve
opportunities/growth, reduce debt, tackle HIV/malaria/TB, fight corruption, promote
peace/security. We also need to tackle trade barriers...I hope G8 will agree not only to plan of
action but also to its implementation, a process of monitoring and review. We all need to be
accountable for carrying out commitments we have made." Changing Climate is on "twin" item,
to keep their lengths reasonable. Starts are similar, but theirmain texts/distributions differ.
Tony Blair "A Year of Huge Challenges" The Economist 01 Jan 05(By Invitation 44-6):-British PM
presents two major global initiatives, to urge G8 to organize and substantially pay(Britain: 05
president).Essay makes strong cases in favor since, "with threat from international terrorism and
spread of weapons of mass destruction.,. they are most serious problems facing world today
[and] problems beyond power of any single country...Solution requires co-ordinated
international action, and above all leadershipwhich G8 is uniquely placed to give. The two
initiatives relate to attacking climate change and solving African issues. Here the only material
summarized is on Changing Climate. "[N]o country will escape its impact. And there can be no
doubt...world getting warmer. Temperatures already risen by 0.7C over past century, and ten
hottest years on record all occurred since 91[;] fastest rise in temperatures in northern
hemisphere for thousand years. This...has meant rise in sea level that, if continues as predicted,
will mean hundreds of millions...increasingly at risk from flooding[, plus]other extreme/
increasingly unpredictable weather events such as rainstorms/droughts will also have heavy
human/economic cost... Overwhelming view of experts is that climate change, to greater or
lesser extent, is man-made and, without action, will get worse...But just as technological
progress/human activity have helped cause problem, also within our power to lessen impact/
adapt to change.[N]eed to act now. Delay will only increase seriousness of problems...and
economic disruption required to move to more renewable energy and sustainablemanufacturing
in future. G8 needs to lead. Kyoto protocol[coming into force]is good news, but... change/
ambition required will be far more[and, with US refusal to sign,]makes measures we could
secure through G8 even more vital." US/Britain have national/state legislation and leading
investment/research under way, and firms' lower-emission status gaining commercial
advantage." We are at stage where role of government/global policy must |